Evaluation of the Parasight Platform for Malaria Diagnosis
Publication Date
2017-03Author
Yochay Eshel, a Arnon Houri-Yafin,a Hagai Benkuzari,a Natalie Lezmy,a Mamta Soni,b Malini Charles,b Jayanthi Swaminathan,c Hilda Solomon,c Pavithra Sampathkumar,b Zul Premji,d Caroline Mbithi,d Zaitun Nneka,d Simon Onsongo,d Daniel Maina,d Sarah Levy-Schreier,a Caitlin Lee Cohen,a Dan Gluck,a Joseph Joel Pollak,a Seth J. Salpetera
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract/ Overview
ABSTRACT The World Health Organization estimates that nearly 500 million malaria
tests are performed annually. While microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are
the main diagnostic approaches, no single method is inexpensive, rapid, and highly
accurate. Two recent studies from our group have demonstrated a prototype computer vision platform that meets those needs. Here we present the results from two
clinical studies on the commercially available version of this technology, the Sight
Diagnostics Parasight platform, which provides malaria diagnosis, species identification, and parasite quantification. We conducted a multisite trial in Chennai, India
(Apollo Hospital [n 205]), and Nairobi, Kenya (Aga Khan University Hospital [n
263]), in which we compared the device to microscopy, RDTs, and PCR. For identification of malaria, the device performed similarly well in both contexts (sensitivity of
99% and specificity of 100% at the Indian site and sensitivity of 99.3% and specificity of 98.9% at the Kenyan site, compared to PCR). For species identification, the device correctly identified 100% of samples with Plasmodium vivax and 100% of samples with Plasmodium falciparum in India and 100% of samples with P. vivax and
96.1% of samples with P. falciparum in Kenya, compared to PCR. Lastly, comparisons
of the device parasite counts with those of trained microscopists produced average
Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.84 at the Indian site and 0.85 at the Kenyan sit